|
Why did EMI pull the Copy Control forum?
We gave consumers the opportunity to use the forum for open feedback and
discussion, both positive and negative. However, after a period of time the
opportunity for discussion was abused and so we were forced to take down
this forum. There is still opportunity for consumers to contact us via our
email address [copycontrol@emi.com.au] should they have any issues.
With the forum gone, how does EMI plan to address consumer complaints in the
future?
Via our email address - copycontrol@emi.com.au
Isn't it a fact that Copy Control discs may have problems playing in car CD
players because those CD players are in fact CD-ROM drives?
EMI wishes to have its music heard by as many people as possible within a
framework that protects the intellectual property rights of our artists and
ourselves. We have received reports of playability issues but these have
been extremely low [0.02%]. We are working with our technology partner to
further improve our playability which is an ongoing process.
Is EMI confident that Copy Control discs are of merchantable quality under
trade practices law?
Yes, absolutely. We also fully comply with the international guidelines set
by the International Federation of Phonographic Industry.
Is EMI under ACCC investigation over Copy Control? The Age is reporting a
complaint has been made - what contact with the ACCC has EMI had over this
issue?
Absolutely not. We refer you to the ACCC's website
http://www.accc.gov.au/media/mediar.htmmet
We met with the ACCC at the outset to explain our decision to protect our
releases and took them through how we would be labelling our product to
advise our consumers of this change.
Is Australia a test market for Copy Control?
Australia is not a test market. In Australia we made the decision to go with
this technology based upon successful market trials in other countries.
There have now been 100 million discs manufactured with this technology
worldwide.
Has EMI got Copy Control mastering installed at DATA, EMI's Australian CD
manufacturer?
Yes we have, and we see this initiative as crucial to protecting that
business,and its employees from illegal activities that erode the legitimate
market for CDs.
Which technology, under license from which company, is EMI using for Copy
Control?
That information is confidential.
Why? Does EMI think it can
achieve security through obscurity? If the technology's so good, what harm
can disclosing it do anyway?
Disclosing the technology would undoubtedly make it more susceptible to
hackers. Our technology is not 100% effective but we are working with out
technology suppliers, based on what we learn from consumer feedback, to
further improve the technology.
Analysis indicates some discs marked with the Copy Control logo are in fact
just Red Book CDs. Isn't this misleading advertising?
We apply the logo only where we use the technology.
Copies of tracks made available on Copy Control discs are circulating on P2P
networks anyway - doesn't this make the technology a little pointless?
The issue is that we must take initiatives to protect the intellectual
property of our artists and ourselves when they are being disregarded. As we
have stated, our technology is not 100% effective, but we are already seeing
evidence that our CDs are not being commercially copied to the same levels
as unprotected CDs.
I've had a few reports that Copy Control discs are easily burnt with
currently available software anyway - what is EMI going to do about this?
We are constantly working, along with consumer feedback, to upgrade and
improve our technology.
|